Author Topic: Reply to Bonnie B., about honor  (Read 280 times)

forbitals

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 226
    • View Profile
Re: Reply to Bonnie B., about honor
« on: July 24, 2019, 04:54:03 pm »
But usually that "passably acceptable argument", as Bertram Karon states it, is part of the justification used for writing the prescription, and getting the client to do the voluntary ingestions.

I know a man who has been convinced that he has ~Bipolar 2~ and he has been given ~medications~.  First it was just one at a very low does, but the dosages and the number these lethal drugs has increased.  He even has an extra one which he can ingest when he feels any anxiety.

He has even talked about suing the county for his original low dosage.  It is less than what the Physician's Desk Reference specifies.

To me his complaint seems absurd.  If one has to ingest such neurotoxins, then of course you just do the bare minimum.  Going lower than PDR does not do any harm.  It is not harmful, unless one really believes that the drugs are a necessity to go on living.

But my friend clearly wants these narcotics to mask his experiences.  I tell him to dump them.  He always says in response, "But I want to enjoy my life".

What he seems to mean is that he wants to be drugged into zombie hood, and this is what he means by enjoying his life.

He wants these drugs to completely mask his negative experiences.

He then goes on to invoke a negative stereotype of a homeless man, and he says that the only thing keeping him from becoming like that, are these drugs.

This is sad.  He thinks the drugs keep him "socially functional".  And it is this which I believe Bertram Karon was calling out when he spoke of "passably acceptable to most people most of the time".

Its the kind of an idea which you would find in someone who has totally submitted to the ideas of the ~mental health~ system, and those being essentially the same as those advanced by the Middle-Class Family.

And so to make it clear, here what I am referring to is it being done with people who are already facing huge and ongoing social harassment, over this imaginary issue of a ~neurological difference~.  To be more clear, it is being directed at those who have been convinced that they have ~Autism - Aspergers~, but instead of admitting that this imaginary ailment has no objective basis, as Sami Timimi says, "no biological markers", and "Autism does not exist."

And these survivors are being told, in effect, that they can be made passably acceptable to most people most of the time, by MDMA.

Now the originator of this, Nick Walker at the California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco, says that it is to deal with "social anxiety".

Walker and his MIA colleague believe that this ~neurodiverstiy~, and in a radicalized form, something which there is zero evidence for, somehow benefit by accepting the label, and by then proclaiming the doctrine of "Cognitive Liberty".

I consider this to be a high level of abuse, and something which has to be responded to.